The prosecutor has more control over life, liberty, and reputation than any other person in America.
The words above are from another era—coming decades before the enormous, years-long spike in admissions to jail and prisons we call "mass incarceration," and longer still before the more recent attempts to roll it back. They were part of a 1940 speech by former U.S. Attorney General and Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson. It can feel as though it took almost eight decades to properly hear his warning.
In recent months and with remarkable speed, prosecutors have become the preeminent target for criminal justice reformers. The power they wield has become the subject of unprecedented scrutiny, and a national campaign has emerged both to educate the public about that power and to organize voters to participate in what had generally been low-profile elections for district attorney.
In our New Thinking podcast series on this debate, we look at the ideas behind the movement—John Pfaff (episode #1) wrote perhaps the most important book summing up the case against prosecutors—and focus on some of its most significant, and unexpected, victories: Kim Foxx in Chicago (episode #4) and Larry Krasner in Philadelphia (episode #6).
As those victories have shown, focusing the energy of reformers on prosecutors has proved a galvanizing strategy. For noted public defender Scott Hechinger (episode #2), “the fact that there is a player in the system that can control the way that these laws operate to drive mass incarceration either one way or another is really empowering for people.”
But there are also challenges for a young movement growing at such an unexpected pace. Adam Foss (episode #5), whose 2016 TED Talk on training prosecutors to use their power for good has now been viewed more than two million times, worries too many reformers are expecting newly-elected “progressive prosecutors” to be able to “turn the system on a dime.”
Moreover, what is the movement's endgame? Does “unchecked” prosecutor power need to be reined in, as some advocate, or does the focus simply need to be on better training, and on electing prosecutors who will use that power well? How much power is too much?